Roddrick Muckelroy, OLB, Texas

Scouting reports of outside and inside linebackers in the 2010 draft.
User avatar
Mr. Offseason
Posts: 276
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 8:03 pm
Location: Edina, Minnesota

Roddrick Muckelroy, OLB, Texas

Postby Mr. Offseason » Thu Apr 08, 2010 3:42 am

Pros: Quick with an impressive burst to the ball, seems to read run very quickly, locates the ball carrier and attacks the ball resulting in very short gains at the LOS and occasionally some TFL’s. Seems to play with good leverage versus the run, even stood up a very large pulling offensive guard in the hole. Looks fluid dropping into coverage, reacts very well to running backs or tight ends slipping out of the backfield for check down passes and took them away all day by flying over to them. Seems to have impressive awareness. He looked great on blitzes and almost had 2 sacks that were hurries and ended up with a sack later in the game. He times his blitzes very well and once he finds a lane to the passer he flies through it and gets a hit on the QB. Wraps up very well, hustles downfield to help on tackles far away from him and had a couple big hits in this game.

Cons: Kind of skinny and possibly undersized. It wouldn’t hurt to add some more weight if it didn’t mean sacrificing any quickness, though he is listed at 235 as of now. Doesn’t shed blocks very well, which limits his potential as a pass rusher and also as a run defender to a degree. Unless he has a lane to the QB via the blitz he doesn’t get there as he has really no pass rush moves to speak of. A few times he rushed the passer, was engaged by the blocker and either had nowhere to go or he would back off and hustle back downfield to try to get back to help make a tackle. Didn’t blitz all too often in this game, probably for that reason. Is patient enough to wait for the blockers to occupy themselves and then punch it and hit the lane to get pressure however.

Overall: He is good in coverage and had a couple impressive pass deflections in this game as he closed on the receiver in his zone and knocked it away, he laid the wood on a couple plays, did a great job of sniffing out screens, routinely played downhill versus the run and wrapped up ballcarriers after short gains in the running game. They won’t be marked as TFL’s, but they were good defensive plays. Showed good leverage when taking on blocks the entire game, displayed his great quickness and burst routinely along with his hustle, seems to be a smart player as far as reading screens, run, etc. and clearly watches film because he understands tendencies well. He blitzes well when he can find a lane but otherwise will not get pressure because he has no pass rush moves, but if he can find a lane he will rush the throw. Is a good wrap-up tackler, showed that he has some pop in his hits when he knows he can afford to load up and deliver the blow. He looks like a solid NFL starter at WLB to me.

Projection: 4th round: Some people have him going later than this, but I don’t see what there isn’t to like him about him. He’s a solid WLB prospect, he plays smart and reads plays well and he is fluid in coverage. He doesn’t support the run as well as he could because he struggles shedding blocks and he isn’t a serious threat as a pass rusher unless he comes in unblocked but at worst he is a solid WLB or a coverage specialist and special teamer. That is why I see him ending up in the 4th round.

1-poor, 2-weak, 3-above average, 4-very good, 5-elite

SPEED: 3.5
Check out my NFL Draft Blog!

And check out the NFL Draft site I write for!

User avatar
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Posts: 26397
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 1:03 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: Roddrick Muckelroy, OLB, Texas

Postby Pudge » Mon Apr 12, 2010 3:39 pm

Texas Senior
40: 4.68

PROS: Shows good speed and range. Has good closing burst on the ball. Does well in pursuit and does a nice job running downhill to make plays in space. Generally takes good angles to the ball and has a nose for it. Is a physical defender, that is a good tackler and likes to hit. Does a nice job attacking upfield, able to shoot gaps and make plays in the backfield. Shows good potential as an interior blitzer for similar reasons. Shows potential in zone coverage, with nice awareness, able to read quarterback and jump short routes. Flashes the potential and athleticism to match up with backs in man coverage in the flat.
CONS: Undersized and it shows at the point of attack. Can be run over by more powerful runners. Gets engulfed by linemen, and tends to try and run around blocks. Less effective when playing near the line of scrimmage because he doesn't get off blocks. Gets stuck in traffic. Makes him an inefficient pass rusher because he doesn't like to engage. Not as effective making plays in pursuit to opposite side of the field because he gets stuck in trash. Needs to get better depth on his zone drops and not used much in man coverage.
OVERVIEW: He plays inside linebacker in Texas 3-4 scheme, but projects best as a WILL linebacker in the 4-3 scheme at the next level. He's fast, physical, and rangy, but is too easily neutralized whne you run at him. A two-year starter that combined for 214 tackles, 14.5 tackles for loss, 2 sacks, 1 pick, and 8 passes defended in that span.Cousin, Joe King, played safety in the NFL from 1991-95. He weighed in at the Senior Bowl at 236, so he's added some needed bulk this off-season.
NFL FORECAST: Muckleroy's playing style is one you like, but he can be limited. He's going to need to have blockers kept off him because he's best when he can flow to the ball and chase. So if he plays in a 3-4, which he can, he needs to play in a scheme where he has a good nose tackle ahead of him and another inside linebacker that can take on blockers and allow him to chase. But he projects better in a 4-3 becuase he'll have more space to operate in. He fits best as a WILL in that scheme, but because of his speed and range, teams might experiment with him at the MIKE. He can play there, but he needs to have defensive tackles that will keep blockers off him. He reminds me of Will Witherspoon in that way, who had one good year at MLB in St. Louis, but for the most part was an obvious better fit at WLB throughout his career. The added bulk to his frame should help him, particularly as he tries to bring down bigger NFL backs, but I'm not sure it's going to make him more effective getting off blocks. He's got potential in coverage, but doesn't show great awareness in zone and wasn't asked to do a lot of man coverage at Texas. So he is a bit of a work in progress there. But I think he could eventually adapt and be effective there. He can be a productive starter in the right scheme, and if he's surrounded by the right talent. But he's not really going to be a playmaker, more like a guy that complements other playmakers. But at the very least, he should have a nice NFL career as a quality reserve.
ATL FORECAST: Muckleroy could fit in Atlanta, but he's not as polished as you'd want in a potential weakside starter. Mainly because of his coverage abilities. But if given a year to develop behind Peterson, he could improve to a degree where he is capable in coverage by 2011, with the potential to actually become good in the years ahead. He's a fast, rangy playmaker that could work in Atlanta's attacking style beside Lofton, but I think he would be somewhat a liability at the point of attack still. And while he could be a productive starter that could easily tally 80-90 tackles in Atlanta, I'm not sure he's a good enough starter/playmaker that within two or three years of him becoming the starter, the team wouldn't try to make a change. So he is really more of a stopgap at OLB rather than a problem solver.
VALUE: He is worth a mid-to-late third rounder for a team looking for a fast, rangy linebacker with starting potential.

1-poor, 2-weak, 3-above average, 4-very good, 5-elite

SPEED: 4.0
"Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis" -- Maharbal, 216 B.C.E.

Return to “Linebackers”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest