It is currently Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:03 am

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Maybe We Deserve to Be Ripped Off By Bush
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 2:42 pm 
Offline
2009 Mock Contest Winner
2009 Mock Contest Winner
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 6:16 am
Posts: 12231
Location: Aschaffenburg, Germany
Maybe We Deserve to Be Ripped Off By Bush's
> > Billionaires
> > By Matt Taibbi, RollingStone.com
> > Posted on February 20, 2007, Printed on February 21,
> > 2007
> > http://www.alternet.org/story/48278/
> > While America obsessed about Brittany's shaved head,
> > Bush offered a budget that offers $32.7 billion in
> > tax cuts to the Wal-Mart family alone, while cutting
> > $28 billion from Medicaid.
> > "Now, after she shaved her head in a bizarre episode
> > that culminates a months-long saga of controversial
> > behavior, it's the question being asked by her fans,
> > her foes and the general public: What was she
> > thinking?"-- Bald and Broken: Inside Britney's
> > Shaved Head, Sheila Marikar, ABC.com, Feb. 19
> >
> > What was she thinking? How about nothing? How about
> > who gives a s***? How's that for an answer, Sheila
> > Marikar of ABC news, you pinhead?
> >
> > I'm not one of those curmudgeons who freaks out
> > every time that Bradgelina moves the war off the
> > front page of the Post, or Katie Couric decides to
> > usher in a whole new era of network news with photos
> > of the imbecile demon-spawn of Tom Cruise and Katie
> > Holmes. I understand that we live in a demand-based
> > economy and that there is far more demand for
> > brainless celebrity bullshit than there is, say, for
> > the fine print of the Health and Human Services
> > budget.
> >
> > But that was before this week. I awoke this morning
> > in New York City to find Britney Spears plastered
> > all over the cover of two gigantic daily newspapers,
> > simply because she cut her hair off over the
> > weekend. To me, this crosses a line. My definition
> > of a news story involves something happening. If
> > nothing happens, then you can't have "news," because
> > nothing has changed since the day before. Britney
> > Spears was an idiot last Thursday, an idiot on
> > Friday, and an idiot on both Saturday and Sunday.
> > She was, shockingly, also an idiot on Monday. It
> > will be news when she stops being an idiot, and
> > we'll know when that happens, because she'll have
> > shot herself for the good of the planet. Britney
> > Spears cutting her hair off is the least-worthy
> > front page news story in the history of humanity.
> >
> > Apparently, from now on, every time a jackass sticks
> > a pencil in his own eye, we'll have to wait an extra
> > ten minutes to hear what happened on the battlefield
> > or in Congress or any other place that actually
> > matters.
> >
> > On the same day that Britney was shaving her head, a
> > guy I know who works in the office of Senator Bernie
> > Sanders sent me an email. He was trying very hard to
> > get news organizations interested in some research
> > his office had done about George Bush's proposed
> > 2008 budget, which was unveiled two weeks ago and
> > received relatively little press, mainly because of
> > the controversy over the Iraq war resolution. All
> > the same, the Bush budget is an amazing document. It
> > would be hard to imagine a document that more
> > clearly articulates the priorities of our current
> > political elite.
> >
> > Not only does it make many of Bush's tax cuts
> > permanent, but it envisions a complete repeal of the
> > Estate Tax, which mainly affects only those who are
> > in the top two-tenths of the top one percent of the
> > richest people in this country. The proposed savings
> > from the cuts over the next decade are about $442
> > billion, or just slightly less than the amount of
> > the annual defense budget (minus Iraq war expenses).
> > But what's interesting about these cuts are how Bush
> > plans to pay for them.
> >
> > Sanders's office came up with some interesting
> > numbers here. If the Estate Tax were to be repealed
> > completely, the estimated savings to just one family
> > -- the Walton family, the heirs to the Wal-Mart
> > fortune -- would be about $32.7 billion dollars over
> > the next ten years.
> >
> > The proposed reductions to Medicaid over the same
> > time frame? $28 billion.
> >
> > Or how about this: if the Estate Tax goes, the heirs
> > to the Mars candy corporation -- some of the world's
> > evilest scumbags, incidentally, routinely ripped by
> > human rights organizations for trafficking in child
> > labor to work cocoa farms in places like Cote
> > D'Ivoire -- if the estate tax goes, those assholes
> > will receive about $11.7 billion in tax breaks.
> > That's more than three times the amount Bush wants
> > to cut from the VA budget ($3.4 billion) over the
> > same time period.
> >
> > Some other notable estimate estate tax breaks,
> > versus corresponding cuts:
> >
> > a.. Cox family (Cox cable TV) receives $9.7
> > billion tax break while education would get $1.5
> > billion in cuts
> > b.. Nordstrom family (Nordstrom dept. stores)
> > receives $826.5 million tax break while Community
> > Service Block Grants would be eliminated, a $630
> > million cut
> > c.. Ernest Gallo family (s***ty wines) receives a
> > $468.4 million cut while LIHEAP (heating oil to
> > poor) would get a $420 million cut
> > And so on and so on. Sanders additionally pointed
> > out that the family of former Exxon/Mobil CEO Lee
> > Raymond, who received a $400 million retirement
> > package, would receive about $164 million in tax
> > breaks.
> >
> > Compare that to the Commodity Supplemental Food
> > Program, which Bush proposes be completely
> > eliminated, at a savings of $108 million over ten
> > years. The program sent one bag of groceries per
> > month to 480,000 seniors, mothers and newborn
> > children.
> >
> > Somehow, to me, that's the worst one on the list.
> > Here you have the former CEO of a company that
> > scored record profits even as it gouged consumers,
> > with gas prices rising more than 70 percent since
> > January of 2001. There is a direct correlation
> > between the avarice of oil company executives and
> > the increased demand for federal aid for heating oil
> > programs like LIHEAP, and yet the federal government
> > wants to reward these same executives for raising
> > prices on the backs of consumers.
> >
> > Even if you're a traditional, Barry Goldwater
> > conservative, the kinds of budgets that Bush has
> > sent to the hill not only this year but this whole
> > century are the worst-case scenario; they increase
> > spending generally while cutting taxes and social
> > programming. They commit taxpayers to giant
> > subsidies of already Croseus-rich energy
> > corporations, pharmaceutical companies and defense
> > manufacturers while simultaneously cutting taxes on
> > those who most directly benefit from those
> > subsidies. Thus you're not cutting spending --
> > you're just cutting spending on people who actually
> > need the money. (According to the Washington Times,
> > which in a supremely ironic twist of fate did one of
> > the better analyses of the budget, spending will be
> > 1.6 percent of GDP higher in the 2008 budget than in
> > was in 2000, while revenues will be 2.6 percent of
> > GDP lower). This is something different from
> > traditional conservatism and something different
> > from big-government liberalism; this is a new kind
> > of politics that transforms the state into a huge,
> > ever-expanding instrument for converting private
> > savings into corporate profit.
> >
> > That's not only bad government, it's bad capitalism.
> > It makes legalized bribery and political connections
> > more important factors than performance and
> > competition in the corporate marketplace. Beyond
> > that, it's just plain f**** offensive to ordinary
> > people. It's one thing to complain about paying
> > taxes when those taxes are buying a bag of groceries
> > once a month for some struggling single mom in
> > eastern Kentucky. But when your taxes are buying a
> > yacht for some asshole who hires African eight
> > year-olds to pick cocoa beans for two cents an hour
> > .... I sure don't remember reading an excuse for
> > that anywhere in the Federalist Papers.
> >
> > I also don't remember reading much about this year's
> > budget. It was a story for about half a minute when
> > it came out two weeks ago. It barely made TV
> > newscasts, and even when it did, only the broad
> > strokes made it on air. There was some fuss about
> > the Alternative Minimum Tax and a mild uproar over
> > the fact that the 2008 budget failed to account for
> > estimates of the costs for wars in Iraq and
> > Afghanistan. But overall, the budget was a
> > non-starter as a news story. As it does every year,
> > it takes a back seat to hot-button issues like gay
> > marriage, the latest election scandal, etc. Already,
> > the 2008 election presidential campaign has gotten
> > far more ink than the 2008 budget. As entertainment,
> > bullshit politics always triumphs over real
> > politics.
> >
> > Here's the thing about the system of news coverage
> > we have today. If the Walton family, or Lee Raymond,
> > or the heirs to the Mars fortune actually needed the
> > news media to work better than it does now, believe
> > me, it would work better. But they have no such
> > need, because the system is working just fine for
> > them as is. The people it's failing are the rest of
> > us, and most of the rest of us, apparently, would
> > rather sniff Anna Nicole Smith's corpse or watch
> > Britney Spears hump a fire hydrant than find out
> > what our tax dollars are actually paying for.
> >
> > s***, when you think about it that way, why not
> > steal from us? People that dumb don't deserve to
> > have money.
> >
> > Matt Taibbi is a writer for Rolling Stone.
> >
> > © 2007 Independent Media Institute. All rights
> > reserved.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  


cron