It is currently Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:16 am

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Team Needs: Fresh Legs Could Improve Falcons at Running Back
PostPosted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 12:56 pm 
Offline
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:03 pm
Posts: 25875
Location: North Carolina
http://falcfans.com/team-needs-fresh-le ... -back-9941

Team Needs: Fresh Legs Could Improve Falcons at Running Back
January 28th, 2014
Aaron Freeman

Running back, a position that once was a veritable strength for the Atlanta Falcons, has now fallen on hard times and has been one of the more unremarkable groups on the roster.

Over recent seasons the Falcons have relied much too heavily on older, declining running backs due to the greater emphasis the team has had on the passing game. Essentially the team seeks players that complement their passing game, as opposed to a player that can be the centerpiece of an offense much like Michael Turner was when he first arrived in Atlanta in 2008.

Current incumbent starter Steven Jackson embodies that mentality. While Jackson is the rare sort of runner that has managed to avoid the menacing clutches of Father Time, he no longer is a back that can carry an offense. And the value that Jackson brought in the passing game in 2013 wasn’t great given too many breakdowns in pass protection and dropped passes.

The goal of the Falcons when they signed Jackson as a free agent a year ago was to get an upgrade over the version of Turner that played in 2012, a version which was on its last legs. And the Falcons can proudly say that mission was accomplished. Despite missing several games at the start of the season, Jackson showed over the final two months of 2013 that he was a much more adept lead back than Turner. And it gives the team some optimism that Jackson could be poised for an even stronger 2014 if he can remain healthy and get improved blocking along the offensive line.

But in reality, the Falcons goal with adding Jackson was about as low as one gets. The 2012 version of Turner was among the league’s least effective starting running backs and the Falcons were arguably the worst rushing attack in the league that season. One analogy would be to compare it to the Jacksonville Jaguars quarterback version, which was arguably the worst in the league in recent years with failed draft pick Blaine Gabbert as the starter. Chad Henne is a better option than Gabbert, but he’s by no means a good option.

Essentially, the Falcons new goal should become to find not just a better option but a good one. Jackson, at this point in his career, is not that.

Including Jackson, the Falcons currently have five running backs on their roster. Traditionally, the Falcons have kept four on the roster, although things changed in 2013 with the solid play of Josh Vaughan during the preseason. The team also got solid production in limited reps from Antone Smith late in the season. And Jacquizz Rodgers is arguably one of the better third down backs on the roster. And with the team’s public support for retaining Jackson for at least another year, the possibility increases that the running back on the unsurest footing may be Jason Snelling.

Snelling is another older back just five months younger than Jackson, despite entering the league three years after him. Snelling’s primary value is his versatility as a role player, capable of being a runner, receiver, blocker, and special teams player. But moderate cap savings coupled with his midseason arrest could make him a bit more expendable in the eyes of the Falcons brass.

But the primary reason why the Falcons would part ways with Snelling is to make way for a younger running back with the potential to be the sort of runner that is reminiscent of a younger version of Turner. It’s unlikely that Jackson will be retained beyond 2014 due to his declining skills in contrast to his increasing cap number. Given that 2014 is also the final year in the contracts of all four remaining Falcons running backs, that increases the likelihood that there is significant roster turnover at the position in 2015. Time is ripe for the Falcons to add a young back with fresh legs that can be stashed on the roster for a year with the intention to take over as the lead rusher a year from now.

Similar to tight end Tony Gonzalez, Jackson is potentially an excellent role model for young backs due to his toughness, work ethic and intelligence. Jackson entered the league as a talented, but immature runner that benefited from spending a year under Faulk before passing him as the starter in his second-year. And despite early friction between the two, the experience made Jackson into a better runner over the course of his long NFL career. The Falcons could seek to have history repeat itself with Jackson now in Faulk’s role as the mentor, and a rookie striving to carry his mantle moving forward.

Ideally the Falcons could draft a running back similar to Jackson that could bring that physical element to the ground attack, but also be a capable complement to the passing game. Said player could form a nice one-two punch with Rodgers, who among all the backs is the only one that is likely to still be a Falcon in 2015.

Atlanta’s need at running back is by no means pressing. They could opt to make no major additions to the roster outside a couple of undrafted rookies and get by in 2014. And given more pressing needs elsewhere on the roster, the Falcons could just put off their need to address this position until 2015. But if the Falcons do come across a good player, they should jump at the chance to draft him. Even though it may not bring as much immediate value as drafting a player at another position and more pressing need, long-term it could be highly valuable. Particularly if that running back can give the team a running back that is reminiscent of a younger Jackson or Turner.

That would be analogous to the Jaguars upgrading their quarterback position not with Chad Henne, but with Andrew Luck.

_________________
"Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis" -- Maharbal, 216 B.C.E.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Needs: Fresh Legs Could Improve Falcons at Running
PostPosted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 8:07 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 7:02 pm
Posts: 6545
Location: Indianapolis IN
I think the Falcons can certainly find a back in the 3rd-6th rounds that can take pressure off of Jackson. It's been awhile since the Falcs have drafted an every down back. Rodgers is good but only in short spurts.

_________________
Sometimes running the Mularkey offense makes me feel like I'm in a prison.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Needs: Fresh Legs Could Improve Falcons at Running
PostPosted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 10:46 pm 
Offline
Superstar
Superstar
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 5:41 pm
Posts: 2375
Location: Albany NY
IDK if Jackson is even better than Snelling at this point? Perhaps we save a few bucks and cut Jackson, then draft a mid round back.

_________________
When life gives you lemons, find some salt and tequila then invite me!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Needs: Fresh Legs Could Improve Falcons at Running
PostPosted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 11:04 am 
Offline
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:03 pm
Posts: 25875
Location: North Carolina
While that would the most prudent "football" move, the Falcons won't do that. Cutting Jackson would save $1.8M against next year's cap, while cutting Snelling saves $1.2 million. But the Falcons will talk up Jackson's leadership, his late-season production, etc. and blame injuries for making him looking mediocre (as they did with Ray Edwards after 2011), and for all the reasons that people like fun gus and backnblack state, they'll cut Snelling, who is a more valuable player. While Jackson > Snelling as a runner, the gap isn't huge. And Snelling is a better at the other parts of the position: catching and blocking, is the team's best fullback as well, not to mention cutting Jackson instead of Snelling clears off greater cap space in 2015 as well (saving roughly $5M vs. $4M).

_________________
"Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis" -- Maharbal, 216 B.C.E.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Needs: Fresh Legs Could Improve Falcons at Running
PostPosted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:29 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 3:11 pm
Posts: 4476
Location: Vancouver, WA
Yeah, it does seem that Snelling is the odd man out. As mentioned earlier the Falcons could probably find plenty of options in the draft towards the middle rounds.

There should be plenty of re-treads on the FA market as well that won't break the bank.

_________________
Fear the BEARD!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Needs: Fresh Legs Could Improve Falcons at Running
PostPosted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:27 pm 
Offline
Superstar
Superstar

Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:15 pm
Posts: 4222
It doesn't matter who you put behind this offensive line, they will look bad. Fresh legs don't matter when you have 3 defenders in the backfield at the snap.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Needs: Fresh Legs Could Improve Falcons at Running
PostPosted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 2:06 am 
Offline
Superstar
Superstar

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4505
The line will be better..... Hawley at center; and the first year players will make a lot of progress their second year!!

The coaching staff will bring in others; you can bet they know the line has to be better.... New line coach should help too.

_________________
"Everything Counts"
Cyril


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Needs: Fresh Legs Could Improve Falcons at Running
PostPosted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:47 am 
Offline
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:03 pm
Posts: 25875
Location: North Carolina
RobertAP wrote:
It doesn't matter who you put behind this offensive line, they will look bad. Fresh legs don't matter when you have 3 defenders in the backfield at the snap.

Well it's a good thing the Falcons don't have that problem.

_________________
"Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis" -- Maharbal, 216 B.C.E.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Needs: Fresh Legs Could Improve Falcons at Running
PostPosted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 2:21 pm 
Offline
Superstar
Superstar

Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:15 pm
Posts: 4222
The Falcons do have that problem. It's not every snap, but our OL is regularly allowing multiple defenders into the backfield on run plays.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Needs: Fresh Legs Could Improve Falcons at Running
PostPosted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 6:07 pm 
Offline
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:03 pm
Posts: 25875
Location: North Carolina
You're right, the Falcons need to improve there. But fresh legs do make a difference.

The Falcons were 21st in the league last year in terms of percentage of runs they had that went for no gain or negative yardage. You know a few teams that were worse than us? San Francisco, Philadelphia, 2 of the better rushing teams in the league, partially because their RBs can create. The Falcons showed improvement in terms of avoiding those negative rushing plays from 2012 to 2013. Do you think that has to do with the OL being better, or do you think some of that has to do with the fact that the Falcons had better RBs in 2013 than they did in 2012?

I'm not saying that the Falcons will suddenly be a Top 10 rushing team with a back with fresh legs, but every little thing helps. Rushing success isn't entirely on the OL, a lot of it has to do with the RB (see Adrian Peterson). You are much too hyper-focused on the OL, which is why you overrate OL play.

_________________
"Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis" -- Maharbal, 216 B.C.E.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Team Needs: Fresh Legs Could Improve Falcons at Running
PostPosted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:03 pm 
Offline
Playmaker
Playmaker
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 9:46 am
Posts: 485
Location: Vacaville, CA
Putrid implosion, comically bad . . . and yet, Antone had those runs. Yes, they are all variables, but, yee gods they were horrible last year.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to: