It is currently Fri Jul 25, 2014 3:55 am

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Pat doesn't remember our recent DE history I guess...
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 6:49 pm 
Offline
Superstar
Superstar
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 4:54 pm
Posts: 1798
Location: Los Angeles California
Pat Yasinskas at ESPN:

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcsouth/post/_ ... or-falcons

The fine folks at ESPN Stats & Information never cease to amaze me with the nuggets they pass along.

They recently sent us some pre-draft stuff, and one item really jumped off the page.

It took SMU defensive end Margus Hunt an average of 2.36 seconds to get to the quarterback on his eight sacks last season. That was the best average of any BCS front-seven prospect rated in the top 80 by Scouts Inc.

And here’s another nugget on Hunt. On all eight of his sacks, he was the first player to contact the quarterback. In other words, he wasn’t cleaning up on what other people had started.

I’m mentioning this because I think Hunt could be a possibility for the Atlanta Falcons with the 30th pick in the draft. I know, the Falcons have a more glaring need at cornerback, but I’m not sure a good one will be available at No. 30. If the Falcons were to put Hunt out there with Osi Umenyiora, the pass rush might be good enough to make any cornerback look better.

By the way, Hunt’s potential isn’t even close to being tapped. He didn’t even start playing football until 2009. Here’s a story I did on Hunt a while back that details how he transformed from a track and field performer in Estonia to a potential first-round pick.

Does this guy not remember Sid or JAM98? Unreal he would even write this...

_________________
"I am certainly not afraid to have Brian Finneran on the field. Has he ever not made plays? He just makes plays. He is one of those guys that just makes plays. He is dependable."

J. Mora JR.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pat doesn't remember our recent DE history I guess...
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:13 pm 
Offline
Playmaker
Playmaker
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 9:46 am
Posts: 469
Location: Vacaville, CA
Hunt is neither of them. That said, he is 26 already and isn't going to peak in football knowledge until hos physical skills are on the way down. I would expect that he'll perform better than expected his first year but fade soon after that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pat doesn't remember our recent DE history I guess...
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 12:36 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 3:11 pm
Posts: 4435
Location: Vancouver, WA
Not entirely sure what the correlation is here either.

_________________
Fear the BEARD!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pat doesn't remember our recent DE history I guess...
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 2:58 pm 
Offline
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:03 pm
Posts: 25761
Location: North Carolina
MarylandFalcon1 wrote:
Does this guy not remember Sid or JAM98? Unreal he would even write this...

Yeah, are you suggesting that because the rawness of guys like Sid and Anderson not working out, the Falcons will never take a raw DE ever again?

Well, I hate to break it to you, but most DEs are raw. The 2 best DEs in this class are raw: Ansah and Jordan. If they reach their potential, they could be the next Julius Peppers and Aldon Smith.

Hunt is the same way. He might take a little longer to develop, because similar to Anderson he needs to use his hands better. But if he reaches his potential, then he could be a J.J. Watt/Justin Smith-caliber of dominator up front. At pick No. 10, you might be averse to that risk, but at pick No. 30, you should not be.

And people act like Sidbury didn't develop. He did. The issue with Sidbury wasn't that he couldn't play, because he was our 3rd best pure pass rusher behind only Abe and Babineaux. He didn't play because he didn't produce on special teams and didn't play the run. Now on many teams that wouldn't be an issue because he could just be a nickel/situational pass rusher. But unfortunately for Sidbury, he played on a Falcon team that the two DEs ahead of him on the depth chart were also nickel specialists. And there's really only room to have 2 of those players on your roster, and thus Sidbury was on the outside looking in.

_________________
"Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis" -- Maharbal, 216 B.C.E.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pat doesn't remember our recent DE history I guess...
PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 1:53 am 
Offline
Superstar
Superstar

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4474
What's raw?

We've had a decent range of defensive ends. Patrick Kerney played other sports so I guess he was raw? Chuck Smith was a football player through & through; and a good
#2 pick. Most are too young to remember Claude Humphries who played while we didn't keep sack stats, and he was great, and we had some busts in the 80s with Pitts, and we never knew where to play Aundrey Bruce; linebacker or defensive end.!!

Bottom line is Pudge is right; teams will always take raw because in the end, a raw Defensive end can be better than a seasoned over rated college star.

Lets not get hung up on one player; but I don't think Sid ever developed much. He really wasn't good at much including rushing the passer.!!

_________________
"Everything Counts"
Cyril


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pat doesn't remember our recent DE history I guess...
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 7:37 am 
Offline
Draught Guru
Draught Guru
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 7:32 am
Posts: 4910
Pudge wrote:
MarylandFalcon1 wrote:
He might take a little longer to develop, because similar to Anderson he needs to use his hands better. But if he reaches his potential, then he could be a J.J. Watt/Justin Smith-caliber of dominator up front. At pick No. 10, you might be averse to that risk, but at pick No. 30, you should not be..



Please God, NO at 30. I like the guy, but we cannot afford to spend our #30 pick on a 'prospect'. We need a guy who can come in and immediately produce. This is not the guy. He's older, only been playing football since 09, and it is going to take him at least 2 years to get up to speed, if he can at all. He's big, and athletic, would be a good ST player (field goals) but he is Kroy Biermann II Estonia Boogaloo. :wink:

I wouldn't pass him up if he falls late 2nd or 3rd but at #30? NO thanks :snooty:

BTW here's where he is projected to go :





CBS Sports-49th

National Football Post-96th

Mocking the Draft-53rd

Sports Illustrated-outside the top 40
:ninja:

Now, if we absolutely HAVE to pick up a raw DE, Id rather go with Darius Slay. This guy only started one year, but he's from around the way, and played in the most dominant conference in college football. It's considerably easier to look like a giant killer against Fresno State :)

_________________
"what if there were no hypothetical situations?"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  


cron