Dan Pompeii Sporting News list his top 10 playmakers

The year's upcoming draft and the college game can be discussed here.

Moderators: Capologist, dirtybirdnw, thescout

User avatar
Posts: 6612
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:02 pm
Location: Indianapolis IN

Dan Pompeii Sporting News list his top 10 playmakers

Postby thescout » Mon Apr 04, 2005 7:48 pm

Forget the flaws -- these guys will produce
Posted: April 4, 2005

Any team can make a long draft wish list of premium prospects, but that's kind of like asking Santa for a plasma TV, a Waverunner, a luxury SUV, a leather massaging recliner, a Rolex and season tickets in a skybox.

Former Cowboys and Dolphins coach Jimmy Johnson took a shrewder approach. After every scout and assistant coach had his say and the draft meetings were over, Johnson identified 10 to 15 players who captured his fancy. Each one might not have been big enough, fast enough or athletic enough. But every one was a producer, and Johnson did what he had to do to get as many of them as he could at specific points in the draft.

The approach enabled Johnson to select players such as offensive tackle Erik Williams in the third round, center Mark Stepnoski in the third, defensive tackle Leon Lett in the seventh, middle linebacker Zach Thomas in the fifth and defensive end Jason Taylor in the third.

Using Johnson's approach as a model, there are 10 playmakers expected to be taken at various stages of the 2005 draft whom I would try to find a way to select.

Early first round: Shawne Merriman, DE/OLB, Maryland. The knock on him is he might not be fluid enough to play linebacker or experienced enough to be an every-down end. He could play anywhere for me -- defensive end, linebacker, safety, tight end. Just get him on the field.

Merriman probably is the most explosive player in the draft. When he collides with an opponent, the opponent always goes backward. He's a shark in shoulder pads. Call me silly, but I like those kind of guys. A lot.

Late first round: Mark Clayton, WR, Oklahoma. At 5-10, 193, he's the size of a typical tax accountant, but with a much more appealing bottom line. Clayton probably is the most complete receiver in the draft. There is nothing he doesn't do well. Clayton is going to make an NFL offense better, and he's going to do it quickly.

Second round: Ciatrick Fason, RB, Florida. Anyone who measures running backs by flash will not hold Fason in high regard. His speed and ability to avoid tacklers are ordinary. But he reads the defense and finds the hole -- as evidenced by his 105.6 rushing yards per game. Another running back from the same school also was said to be too slow. This year, Emmitt Smith retired as the NFL's all-time leading rusher.

Second to third round: Matt McCoy, OLB, San Diego State. The Scouting Combine invited 333 prospects but not McCoy. The bet here is he'll be a better pro than at least 300 of those players. All he does is find the ball quicker than most and punish the person holding it.

Third round: Dan Buenning, G, Wisconsin. What he lacks in athleticism and power he makes up for in instincts, awareness, competitiveness and leadership. Buenning is the kind of guy who raises the bar for the whole team.

Third round: Ray Willis, OT, Florida State. If teammate Alex Barron had Willis' heart, he might be the first pick in the draft. Willis will be physically outmatched at times, but his toughness and focus will win a lot of battles.

Fourth round: Scott Starks, CB, Wisconsin. The abundance of good corners in the draft combined with his lack of size could make him a tremendous value pick. At 5-8, 172, Starks might be too small to play every down, but he could become the best nickel back in the NFL. Outside of size limitations, there is nothing not to like about Starks.

Fourth round: Stefan LeFors, QB, Louisville. This lefthander is undersized and might not be able to throw the ball across an eight-lane highway, but he's one heck of an accurate passer. LeFors led the NCAA by completing 73.5 percent of his passes, which speaks to his feel for the game. In the right situation, he can be a winner in the NFL.

Fifth round: Matt Grootegoed, S, Southern California. Many NFL teams are concerned this 5-11, 211-pound college linebacker won't be a fit at any position in the NFL. With the way Grootegoed makes plays, there would be a spot for him in my lineup any day. Even if he fails at safety, he should be an all-star-caliber performer on special teams.

Sixth round: Taylor Stubblefield, WR, Purdue. No player in NCAA history caught more passes than Stubblefield (309), yet he was not invited to the Combine. He is considered not big enough or fast enough -- a beneficiary of the Purdue system. What Stubblefield has is excellent short-area quickness. That should enable him to separate and find a niche as a slot receiver

User avatar
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Posts: 26397
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 1:03 pm
Location: North Carolina

Postby Pudge » Tue Apr 05, 2005 12:26 am

Although I won't disagre with what Pompeii had to say about each player because he could be right, I think with some of those assessments, he's really overvaluing the players stock.

Maybe he means that McCoy should be a 2nd/3rd rounder, but based on his stock right now, he'd be lucky to be taken higher than a 5th. The same goes for Buenning and Willis. Lefors is a 7th/undrafted prospect that only a few teams are looking at because he "can't" play in most teams offenses.

I can't say much from personal evaluations of these prospects. Lefors didn't really impress me much a year ago. He looked like a playmaker, but didn't look like he had the pocket presence to be a good NFL QB. He seemed like he was destined to make his mark north of the border. I didn't get to see much of him this past year, and I've known people to improve exponentially over one season (Jacob Rogers and Kenechi Udeze are two examples).

As for Grootegoed, he's a guy I did like as a junior and think he can be a good NFL player. I would rank his future prospects somewhere between Tillman and Archuleta, which basically means he'll be a good starter. He would be a player I would love to get on the 2nd day of the draft if the right SS is not there on Day 1.

Stubblefield as Pompeii states seems to me a guy that can become a good slot receiver, but doesn't have the strength or toughness to be a starter in the NFL. Reminds me a bit of Terrence Edwards, except his hands are probably not as good, although he is probably a bit quicker. But again, that's judging him based off his junior season.

We'll see how these guys turn out and if the Falcons are one of the teams that heed Pompeii's words.
"Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis" -- Maharbal, 216 B.C.E.

Return to “The War Room”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest