MLB: Who should start? (

Discuss your favorite team: the Atlanta Falcons. As well as all NFL and pro football-related topics, including fantasy football.

Moderators: Capologist, dirtybirdnw, thescout

User avatar
Posts: 4526
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 2:11 pm
Location: Vancouver, WA

MLB: Who should start? (

Postby dirtybirdnw » Fri Oct 14, 2005 1:07 pm posted a fan poll asking who people thought should start at MLB.

Brooking: 52.9%
Reese: 24.4%
Boley: 13%
Williams: 9.8%

Although moving Williams (6' 232lbs) over to middle and letting Boley get the start at strong side would be intreguing. It won't happen but on passing downs it would be worth a shot. I would note that Reese is 10lbs lighter while being 2" taller. I still think Boley should get the start at 6'3" 236lbs he fits the mold best.

According to the depth chart Reese is the new MLB....

WLB: Williams, Boley, Patterson
MLB: Reese, Cash, Leake
SLB: Brooking, Boley, Patterson

Also an update for the depth chart at CB (it's ugly)....
LCB: Hall, Rossum
RCB: Webster, Morton, Torrence

I'll also noticed that we have 1 backup at DE on the depth chart (Davis).
Fear the BEARD!

User avatar
Posts: 869
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 8:51 pm

Postby The_Incomparable » Fri Oct 14, 2005 7:16 pm

Wow, our depth has taken a huge hit already. I agree with starting Reese, but if he doesn't work out I am intrigued to see what Boley can do. He seems like a physical presence, but can he shed a block...which is sort of the same question I have about Reese. The great thing about Reese is he is super aggressive & willing to risk giving up a few extra yards to make a big play in the backfield. That makes for an explosive linebacker &, for those Eagles fans who down on Reese, Trotter was a special teams stud for awhile there too so I am expecting big things out of Reese and am more comfortable pulling him out on passing downs than pulling out a MLB who got a $8mil signing bonus.
Props to Scar for my sig.

User avatar
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Posts: 26397
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 1:03 pm
Location: North Carolina

Postby Pudge » Sat Oct 15, 2005 3:01 am

Say what you want, but at least the Falcons have options here since players can play multiple positions, so the Falcons can throw a variety of lineups out there over the next few weeks to see how things work out. And unlike an OL, continuity won't be as important with LBs.
"Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis" -- Maharbal, 216 B.C.E.

Return to “The Huddle”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest