It is currently Thu Aug 28, 2014 8:23 pm

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Going back to the big receivers...
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:09 am 
Offline
Superstar
Superstar

Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:31 pm
Posts: 3110
Good article on why we have big receivers as opposed to small burners. I believed we discussed this a few weeks ago....

http://www.ajc.com/sports/content/sport ... lcons.html

A few highlights....

"That is how the game has evolved. We've got guys that can run and can make plays over defensive backs that are 5 feet 8, 5 feet 9. Our size also helps our offense because it gives our quarterback targets to see down the field."

Vick is 6 feet, but he has to see over 6-4 linemen — when he's in the pocket. He's often on the move, shrinking his visibility lanes, especially because the Falcons' version of the West Coast offense calls on receivers to run routes in high-traffic zones.



and...

"The reason we wanted big receivers is based on the offense," president and general manager Rich McKay said. "The ability to block and be a factor on the inside is a huge factor. In the passing game, tall guys present huge targets as they cross the field. In the West Coast offense, you have so many horizontal routes and you have so many guys crossing the field that you need bigger targets."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Agree
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:30 pm 
Offline
Superstar
Superstar
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 4:54 pm
Posts: 1798
Location: Los Angeles California
Agreed, I think there is much less risk when putting a big WR out there. Small guys just aren't cutting it these days.

MF1

_________________
"I am certainly not afraid to have Brian Finneran on the field. Has he ever not made plays? He just makes plays. He is one of those guys that just makes plays. He is dependable."

J. Mora JR.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 3:34 pm 
Offline
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:03 pm
Posts: 25856
Location: North Carolina
Well I think it depends on the QB. The Colts have been able to have success with WRs that by most standards are considered small: Marvin Harrison (6-0/175), Reggie Wayne (6-0/195), Brandon Stokley (5-11/195), and Troy Walters (5-7/170) as are the Patriots: David Givens (6-0/215), Deion Branch (5-9/195), Troy Brown (5-10/195), and Andre Davis (6-1/195). Is it a coincidence at the size of their QBs that are 6-5 and 6-4?

_________________
"Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis" -- Maharbal, 216 B.C.E.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 3:42 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 3:11 pm
Posts: 4475
Location: Vancouver, WA
Pudge wrote:
Is it a coincidence at the size of their QBs that are 6-5 and 6-4?


I think there is a parrallel there.

_________________
Fear the BEARD!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to: