It is currently Wed Nov 26, 2014 2:23 am

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Tuck Rule?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 12:57 pm 
Offline
Draught Guru
Draught Guru
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 7:32 am
Posts: 5073
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/writer/jas ... nd-rebuild

It's time for the New York Giants to come to grips with the fact that this is not their season.

The longer the losing goes, the more they look like a team in transition needing a rebuild along both sides of the line. As you ponder that, it's impossible not to consider that Tom Coughlin might just be ready to enjoy his post-football life come this winter, as well.

So, what do I suggest they do?

Well, they can't rebuild on the fly because the kind of talent available in free agency and trades won't help much (Jon Beason of 2010 ... OK, I would sign on for that.) It's time to embrace the future and see just how the rest of the league values your roster. The sooner the better, before the market becomes even more saturated as the trade deadline approaches. Sunday's latest lopsided defeat, against the previously reeling Eagles, confirms this 0-5 start is no fluke. Even in the NFC Least, the Giants will not be contenders.

If it's me, I'm calling Justin Tuck and Hakeem Nicks into my office, thanking them for their years of service and efforts to win championships. I'm sincerely telling both that we will make an effort to re-sign them in free agency, but with their contracts expiring and this team rebuilding and so many contending teams in need of precisely what they do -- rushing the passer (Tuck) and catching pretty much whatever is thrown near them (Nicks) -- I need to stockpile picks for the 2014 draft.

Rather than risk losing them in March anyway, and only then getting compensatory picks in 2015 that I can't trade, I need to jumpstart the retooling of this roster. In a perfect world I load up on mid-round picks (if the Browns would have dealt a third for Eugene Monroe, I can get a strong Day 2 draft return for these two guys) and then bring one -- if not two -- of these guys back as a free agent.

The Giants have pretty much shunned using the franchise tag for non-kickers in the past, so that's probably not a tool that would apply here. All the more reason to begin some calculated trade discussions that could be a boon in both the short and long term.

It's a new world approach, and not the kind of thing you think of when you consider the pragmatic way the Giants operate, but I wouldn't want to wait any longer or risk trade-able assets getting hurt or anything like that. I'm acting now. You don't think the Ravens or 49ers would have to explore a guy like Nicks? That wouldn't be right up New England's alley? Nicks would immediately leap past Kenny Britt as the best receiving option available.

The Falcons, in Super Bowl or bust mode and lacking any sort of pass rush after signing ex-Giant Osi Umenyiora in free agency this offseason, wouldn't want to take a crack at Tuck, who has been a postseason pass-rushing demon? New Orleans wouldn't want to add another pass rusher to the mix? Chicago couldn't use him?
I could go on and on.

And this isn't unique to the Giants.

The Jaguars love Maurice Jones-Drew and his leadership and would consider re-signing him. All of that is great, but in the meantime get a pick for him and you can always go back to him in March when he is a free agent. Especially having dealt Monroe and losing No. 2 overall pick Luke Joeckel for the season, the running game isn't going to work. MJD's numbers aren't going to improve. Get a pick if you can.

The Vikings salvaged their season with a victory over winless Pittsburgh in Week 4 and they have added Josh Freeman, but I don't see them reaching the playoffs this season with or without Freeman. If they are sitting at 1-6 or 2-5 at the end of the month, I would be checking if anyone wants to take half of Jared Allen's $14 million salary off my hands and give me a high pick or picks for him. Imagine what he might fetch, even if a contender is just renting him for the stretch run?

Allen is a face-of-the-franchise guy, the Vikings love him and he loves the Vikings, but, again, I can always fight like hell to re-sign him. I can give him a chance to win this season if my team is out of the race, and I can try to get two or three playoff-bound teams in a bidding war for him. I'll also try like heck to convince my owner to eat a chunk of the salary in the trade to lessen the salary-cap hit for the other team like the Ravens and Steelers benefitted from in their deals for left tackles last week.

It might sound drastic to some, but the sooner I can come to grips with the reality of what my team is the sooner I can get a jump on the competition and begin assessing how much value there is on my roster and how I can be best positioned to make things happen this spring.

There are no guarantees I'm going to be able to re-sign these kinds of players anyway, and there just might be no better time than the present to begin repositioning the franchise for the future.

_________________
"what if there were no hypothetical situations?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tuck Rule?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 7:49 pm 
Offline
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:03 pm
Posts: 26073
Location: North Carolina
Justin Tuck > Osi.


And Tuck was "done" last year. The Falcons got the 4th best pass rusher on the Giants D-line last year. Baltimore got the 2nd best, Chris Canty.

Meanwhile, Canty, Michael Bennett, Cliff Avril, and Elvis Dumervil are succeeding in their respective cities, and we have Osi.

Nice pick, Cowher. :beef:

_________________
"Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis" -- Maharbal, 216 B.C.E.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tuck Rule?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 12:44 am 
Offline
Superstar
Superstar

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4708
Fun Gus Wrote
Quote:
It might sound drastic to some, but the sooner I can come to grips with the reality of what my team is the sooner I can get a jump on the competition and begin assessing how much value there is on my roster and how I can be best positioned to make things happen this spring.


That's not drastic, its smart!!

_________________
"Everything Counts"
Cyril


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tuck Rule?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 4:32 pm 
Offline
Superstar
Superstar
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 6:59 pm
Posts: 1169
Location: San Diego, CA
I would have really liked if they brought in M.Bennet to play opposite Osi even if Kroy would have been healthy I just like that combination. If we cant start generating pressure naturally we need to start manufacturing it with the blitz, because if we keep letting QBs sit back there and have dinner we are gonna lose anyway.

_________________
The Young Gunner


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], RobertAP and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to: