how the Rams beat the Cardinals

Discuss your favorite team: the Atlanta Falcons. As well as all NFL and pro football-related topics, including fantasy football.

Moderators: Capologist, dirtybirdnw, thescout

User avatar
fun gus
Draught Guru
Draught Guru
Posts: 5301
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 6:32 am

how the Rams beat the Cardinals

Postby fun gus » Thu Sep 12, 2013 2:58 pm

he St. Louis Rams eked out a close win over the game Arizona Cardinals this last Sunday. It was a game that exposed some of the Rams' weaknesses and certainly illustrated their considerable strengths, including their pass rushers and new tight end Jared Cook.

What we want to know as Falcons fans, of course, is how the Rams won and what that means for the Falcons this weekend. To that end, I turned to 3k at Turf Show Times, who was kind enough to provide me with this short breakdown:

The Rams got off to their first 1-0 start since 2006 with a comeback win over the Arizona Cardinals in St. Louis on Sunday. It wasn't pretty, but the Rams got the job done and set a few high marks to repeat...and a few low bars to improve on.

The offense sputtered early behind a lackluster running game and some very conservative playcalling on both sides. While Sam Bradford had a good game, save for one costly mistake that resulted in a a #FATGUYTOUCHDOWN on a pick six, the highlight of the offense was Jared Cook. Cook repeatedly turned short and intermediate receptions into long gains finishing with seven catches for 141 yards and two touchdowns. He should have had three, but rookie CB Tyrann Mathieu of Honey Badgerian fame was able to poke the ball out just before Cook crossed the end zone.

The defense took a conservative approach that Rams fans are annoyed by, but it avoids the bigger highlights (for the most part) that can rile any fan base. It's a scheme that sets the cornerbacks well off the receivers blanketing the sidelines and keeping the top on the defense forcing offenses to work underneath the secondary and throughout the short middle of the field. While it's tiresome to see an experienced QB like Carson Palmer dink and dunk first downs off, it prevents (yeah, I went there) bigger passing opportunities downfield. The one big play the Cardinals had on offense was a ridiculous one handed catch by Michael Floyd made while being perturbed by a defending Cortland Finnegan. I can understand why so many Rams fans are irked to let easy plays go under the middle, but when you've got the Rams' pass rush that they do headlined by Robert Quinn (3 sacks, 2 FF on Sunday) any mistake that a QB makes is going to be capitalized on (see: Trumaine Johnson's interception that set the Rams up at the Arizona 4-yard line.).

It worked just well enough to allow the Rams to overcome their early mistakes as well as an 11-point deficit to start the fourth quarter for a much needed season-opening win. ... -cardinals
"what if there were no hypothetical situations?"

User avatar
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Posts: 26397
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 1:03 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: how the Rams beat the Cardinals

Postby Pudge » Thu Sep 12, 2013 3:48 pm

Simple, but pretty accurate summary/breakdown of the Rams-Cardinals game.

If the Falcons can protect Ryan, they should have little issue moving the ball against the Rams. Also they need to avoid turnovers, which could become an issue if the pressure gets to Ryan. The strength of the Rams defense is their ability to get pressure with just 4 guys (namely Long & Quinn), which will mean they can drop more guys into coverage to blanket Julio & Gonzo.

But I also think that we should be able to bate Bradford into some turnovers as well. If the defense can give the offense more opportunities to score, this could be the difference between a Falcons win that comes down to the final drive, or a Falcons win that has them up 2 or 3 scores at some point in the 3rd quarter, and coasting in the 4th.
"Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis" -- Maharbal, 216 B.C.E.

Return to “The Huddle”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest