Here's the forum that has all the polls from before.viewforum.php?f=13
I'm just trying to get an idea of what people would prefer the voting process to be. We can figure out which players to add later.
I'm just curious if people want to just have it more of a free-for-all (kind of like how the annual awards voting
is set up), or an ordered process like before (where you vote on position groups for a specific/finite period of time). And if the ordered process, what sort of ordered process...
Before the ordered process made sense since we were starting from scratch, and it basically covered the entire summer, leading all the way up to training camp as you may recall: viewtopic.php?f=13&t=8017
Since we've already voted for the brunt of the team and thus will only be really voting on adding players e.g. Matt Ryan, Tony Gonzalez, John Abraham, etc. to replace people like Chris Miller, Junior Miller, Mike Gann, etc., then the ordered process probably isn't necessary. But one of the benefits of the weekly voting last time was we had some fairly good discussion for some of the position groups, and I'm curious if people want to do it again that way.
I'm just not sure if it's necessary to set up a week's worth of voting just to figure out whether Matt Ryan should replace Miller or Vick or whoever.
BTW, here's how the final roster turned out in case you're too lazy to spend the 18 seconds finding it