It is currently Thu Apr 17, 2014 12:35 pm

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Should the Falcons Have Punted?
PostPosted: Sat Jan 01, 2011 1:23 pm 
Offline
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 7:12 pm
Posts: 6077
Location: Planet Claire
Again, it is semantics, I think. "No brainer," "threw" the game...just hyperbole.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the Falcons Have Punted?
PostPosted: Sat Jan 01, 2011 4:39 pm 
Offline
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:03 pm
Posts: 25552
Location: North Carolina
And again, I'll say it's not just semantics. IMO, it was a no brainer. Meaning that it was an obvious and easy call to go for it. The "conventional wisdom" might have suggested otherwise, but as we continue to find out week after week and year after year, often times the conventional wisdom is just plain wrong.

Slowly, yet surely teams are starting to realize that punting the ball and playing the field position game is often times for suckers. And late in the 4th quarter, with the league's top clutch performer, down 3 points, and with the league's best team converting on 4th down, it shouldn't have required that much intelligence to figure it out.

_________________
"Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis" -- Maharbal, 216 B.C.E.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the Falcons Have Punted?
PostPosted: Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:42 pm 
Offline
Superstar
Superstar

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4337
The "conventional wisdom"-------The very fact that conventional wisdom says punt takes away a no-brainer.....

Maybe we have our definition of " no brainer " wrong. If a guy sticks a gun in my ribs and says give me your money that's
a no brainer........ If a two people approach me and I don't see any weapons, and they ask for my money the "conventional wisdom" would perhaps be hand your money over....., but I probably wouldn't they'd have to take it.......

If I'm shot and killed people would say that giving your money to thugs on the street was a "no brainer" but
when you have a choice where the outcome isn't obvious then it stops being a no brainer to me.....

My instinct said go for it, but "no brainer" suggested everyone would have done what Smith didn't.

_________________
"Everything Counts"
Cyril


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the Falcons Have Punted?
PostPosted: Sat Jan 01, 2011 10:04 pm 
Offline
Superstar
Superstar
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 5:41 pm
Posts: 2297
Location: Albany NY
:doh:

_________________
When life gives you lemons, find some salt and tequila then invite me!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the Falcons Have Punted?
PostPosted: Sat Jan 01, 2011 10:45 pm 
Offline
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 7:12 pm
Posts: 6077
Location: Planet Claire
Pudge wrote:
And again, I'll say it's not just semantics. IMO, it was a no brainer. Meaning that it was an obvious and easy call to go for it. The "conventional wisdom" might have suggested otherwise, but as we continue to find out week after week and year after year, often times the conventional wisdom is just plain wrong.

Slowly, yet surely teams are starting to realize that punting the ball and playing the field position game is often times for suckers. And late in the 4th quarter, with the league's top clutch performer, down 3 points, and with the league's best team converting on 4th down, it shouldn't have required that much intelligence to figure it out.

So....you hate the Jews!

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the Falcons Have Punted?
PostPosted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:02 am 
Offline
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:03 pm
Posts: 25552
Location: North Carolina
No, I don't think we have differing opinions about what a "no brainer" is.

In your example, giving up the goods is the no brainer. You don't have to choose to do that, but most people without thinking are going to give up the goods just to be on the safe side. It's just money, and are you willing to bet your life on it?

Now if you don't think they have guns or know Jeet Kune Do, then maybe you don't do that. But that probably requires a bit of thinking to measure your situation and then calculate the odds. But even so, you've changed variables with 2 possibly unarmed defedners, which can certainly change whether it's a no brainer or not.

In our case, Smitty's gut reaction shoudl have been, let's try and win this game right here and right now. And once he began to actually think about it, he should have also figured it out. He should have just had a feel for the thing. But if you had changed any of the variables, made it 4th & 11 or added 38 seconds to the clock, or changed the field position, perhaps the conventional wisdom would have been the right call.

Cyril wrote:
-The very fact that conventional wisdom says punt takes away a no-brainer.....

Not particularly. You have to factor in that much of this conventional wisdom was developed in the 60s and 70s when the game was a lot different. Playing prevent defense is conventional wisdom, and most would say not playing the prevent is a no brainer.

_________________
"Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis" -- Maharbal, 216 B.C.E.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the Falcons Have Punted?
PostPosted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 8:05 pm 
Offline
Superstar
Superstar

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4337
Well he must have got the message and gone for it twice on forth down....He must have called the wrongs plays because we didn't ,make either....

_________________
"Everything Counts"
Cyril


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the Falcons Have Punted?
PostPosted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 9:58 pm 
Offline
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:03 pm
Posts: 25552
Location: North Carolina
Apparently, Smitty only goes for it on 4th if it's only 1 or 2 yards to get to the sticks.

_________________
"Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis" -- Maharbal, 216 B.C.E.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the Falcons Have Punted?
PostPosted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 10:06 pm 
Offline
Draught Guru
Draught Guru
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 7:32 am
Posts: 4814
Pudge wrote:
Apparently, Smitty only goes for it on 4th if it's only 1 or 2 yards to get to the sticks.



or your playing against Clausen :mrgreen:

_________________
"what if there were no hypothetical situations?"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to: